The vision of the DfE is supported by the following four key pillars
Commercial
- Using collective buying power to secure betters deals
- Reducing inefficiencies and excess supplier costs
Assets
- Making best use of estates and buildings and any financial reserves
- Ensuring assets are used in the pupils’ best interests and deliver value
Workforce
- Improving the deployment and planning of staffing
- Reducing agency costs, reviewing leadership pay and addressing recruitment / retention challenges
Capability
Building system capability through
- Better financial management
- Data use and benchmarking
- Digital tools and automation
Contact Carly
Frequently asked questions: Maximising value for pupils in academy trusts
What does ‘value for money’ mean in an academy trust context?
Value for money means using available resources in a way that delivers the best possible outcomes for pupils. It is not simply about reducing costs.
The approach by the Department for Education (DfE) focuses on ensuring spending decisions are effective, evidence-based and aligned with educational priorities. This includes considering the impact of staffing, procurement, technology, estates and other resources to ensure public funds are used efficiently while maintaining or improving educational quality.
Why is benchmarking important for academy trusts?
Benchmarking helps trusts compare their spending and performance against similar organisations across the sector.
By reviewing data against peer schools or trusts, leaders can identify unusually high costs, uncover efficiency opportunities and better understand whether resources are being deployed effectively.
Benchmarking can also provide evidence to support trustee decision-making and help demonstrate that key spending choices are delivering appropriate value for pupils.
How can academy trusts reduce costs without affecting educational outcomes?
The most effective approach is to focus on efficiency rather than indiscriminate cost-cutting.
This may involve reviewing procurement arrangements, reducing unnecessary supplier costs, improving workforce planning, making better use of digital tools, or optimising the use of buildings and facilities. Savings achieved through improved efficiency can often be reinvested into teaching, student support, technology or other initiatives that directly benefit pupils.
Which areas of spending should trustees scrutinise most closely?
Staffing costs typically represent the largest area of expenditure for most academy trusts and therefore warrant careful oversight.
Trustees should also regularly review procurement arrangements, estates management, energy costs, technology investments and the use of financial reserves. Effective governance requires boards to challenge assumptions, understand spending trends and ensure significant expenditure can be justified in terms of educational impact and value for money.
Can academy trusts benefit from collective purchasing arrangements?
Yes. Collective purchasing can help academy trusts secure better prices and reduce procurement costs.
By using approved frameworks or participating in larger purchasing arrangements, trusts may be able to access improved contract terms, lower supplier costs and reduced administrative burdens. This can be particularly relevant for areas such as energy, technology, educational services and temporary staffing, where buying power may generate significant savings.
What role does workforce planning play in financial sustainability?
Effective workforce planning is one of the most important drivers of long-term financial sustainability.
Strategic workforce planning helps trusts align staffing structures with educational needs, reduce reliance on expensive agency staff, anticipate recruitment challenges and make informed decisions about leadership and support roles. A proactive approach can help manage costs while ensuring schools have the staff and expertise needed to deliver high-quality education.
What evidence should trustees retain to demonstrate value for money?
Trust boards should be able to show that major spending decisions were informed, proportionate and supported by appropriate evidence.
Useful evidence may include benchmarking data, business cases, procurement reviews, budget forecasts, board discussions and assessments of educational impact. Maintaining a clear audit trail can help demonstrate effective governance and provide confidence that resources are being managed in pupils’ best interests.
Is achieving value for money solely the responsibility of finance teams?
No. Value for money is a governance and leadership responsibility across the entire organisation.
While finance professionals play a key role in providing analysis and oversight, trustees, senior leaders and operational teams all influence how resources are deployed. The strongest outcomes are often achieved when educational, operational and financial decision-making are considered together rather than in isolation.
Does having reserves mean a trust is not delivering value for money?
No. Holding reserves does not automatically indicate inefficient financial management.
Reserves can provide financial resilience, support future investment and help trusts manage unexpected pressures. The key question is whether reserves are held for a clear purpose and
whether trustees can demonstrate that financial resources, including reserves, are being managed strategically to support pupils’ long-term interests.
How can academy trusts prepare for increasing scrutiny of value-for-money decisions?
Trusts should adopt a data-driven approach supported by regular review and challenge.
This includes making effective use of benchmarking tools, reviewing major cost categories, evaluating procurement arrangements, monitoring workforce efficiency and ensuring decisions are documented appropriately. As expectations around accountability and stewardship of public funds continue to increase, trusts that can clearly evidence informed decision-making will be better placed to demonstrate strong governance and financial management.



